Stormwater Atlas

← Practices

Infiltration Trench

Generated 8/13/2026, 10:42:17 AM · composer-2.5:run-d653a62a-bcfd-44df-b829-f42112de0ff0

Provisional practice synthesis — not a design manual or adopted regulation. Numbers come from atlas design_parameters; verify against source PDFs. Controlling state/local criteria apply when more stringent.

National baseline

Among Tier A manuals that mention infiltration trenches, numeric guidance is sparse for practice-specific facility dimensions; the extracted numbers cluster around jurisdiction-wide water-quality and drawdown context rather than a uniform trench cross-section standard. Where manuals state a design infiltration rate for sizing, 17 sources report values with a mode and median of 0.5 in/hr and a range from 0.01 to 2.41 in/hr—useful as a screening assumption in temperate settings with moderate soils, not as a national design constant. Site-wide water-quality volume depth appears in 30 manuals with mode 1 inch, median 1 inch, and range 0.37–1.61 inches; maximum ponding or drawdown time appears in 36 manuals with mode 72 hours, median 48 hours, and range 4–120 hours; separation from seasonal high water table appears in 36 manuals with mode 24 inches, median 36 inches, and range 12–120 inches. Committee discussion should treat these as overlapping jurisdictional sizing and siting guardrails when trenches are used to meet volume or infiltration performance, while recognizing that 45 of 76 scanned manuals lack extracted WQv depth, 38 lack drawdown hours, 38 lack SHWT separation, and 23 of 41 mentioning manuals lack a stated design infiltration rate—so a single numeric national baseline for trench geometry is not yet established from this matrix alone.

Matrix summary

For infiltration_trench in Tier A manuals (41 of 76 mention the practice): site-wide wqv_depth_inches n=30, mode=1, median=1, range 0.37–1.61; max_drawdown_hours n=36, mode=72, median=48, range 4–120; shwt_separation_inches n=36, mode=24, median=36, range 12–120; design_infiltration_rate_in_per_hr n=17, mode=0.5, median=0.5, range 0.01–2.41—with substantial missing data for each field.

Cross-state parameters

Site water-quality depth (not practice-specific)

n=30 · mode=1 · median=1 · range=0.37–1.61 inches

StateSlugValue
MAboston-ma1 inches
MDbaltimore-md1 inches
VAchesapeake-va1 inches
MIdetroit-mi1 inches
AZflagstaff-az1 inches
TXhouston-tx0.5 inches
MNminneapolis-mn1.25 inches
VAnorfolk-va1 inches
ORportland-or1.61 inches
NVlas-vegas-nv0.37 inches
CTct-state1.3 inches
TXdallas-tx1.5 inches
GAga-state1.2 inches
INindiana-manual1 inches
IAia-state-ch11.25 inches
MEmaine-manual1 inches
MAma-state-draft1 inches
MImichigan-manual1 inches
MOkansas-city-marc-bmp1.37 inches
NEne-ndot-stf0.5 inches
NHnh-state1 inches
NYny-state1.2 inches
NCnc-state1 inches
OHohio-rainwater0.75 inches
PApa-state1.2 inches
PAphiladelphia-pa1.5 inches
RIri-state1 inches
HIhawaii-dot-pcbmp1 inches
COdenver-co0.6 inches
VTvt-state1 inches
WVwest-virginia-manual1 inches

Max drawdown / dewatering time

n=36 · mode=72 · median=48 · range=4–120 hours

StateSlugValue
ALalabama-handbook40 hours
NMalbuquerque-nm-gsi96 hours
CAca-casqa-municipal72 hours
CAca-caltrans-construction96 hours
IDboise-id48 hours
VAchesapeake-va48 hours
ILchicago-il72 hours
OHcolumbus-oh72 hours
AZflagstaff-az24 hours
TXhouston-tx48 hours
ORportland-or30 hours
WAseattle-wa24 hours
NVlas-vegas-nv72 hours
CTct-state48 hours
CAlos-angeles-ca96 hours
DEde-wet-ponds-draft24 hours
FLfl-fsesci-tier14 hours
IDidaho-bmp-catalog72 hours
INindiana-manual24 hours
MEmaine-manual48 hours
MDmd-state24 hours
MAma-state-draft72 hours
MOkansas-city-marc-bmp40 hours
MNmn-state-200848 hours
MSms-state-vol2120 hours
MTbillings-mt72 hours
MTmt-deq872 hours
NEne-ndot-stf72 hours
NJnj-state72 hours
PApa-state72 hours
PAphiladelphia-pa72 hours
RIri-state48 hours
SCsouth-carolina-manual72 hours
HIhawaii-dot-pcbmp48 hours
TNtn-state24 hours
VTvt-state48 hours
WAwa-state-western48 hours
WVwest-virginia-manual48 hours

SHWT separation

n=36 · mode=24 · median=36 · range=12–120 inches

StateSlugValue
ALalabama-handbook24 inches
NMalbuquerque-nm-gsi36 inches
WAbellevue-wa60 inches
IDboise-id36 inches
VAchesapeake-va12 inches
ILchicago-il24 inches
MIdetroit-mi24 inches
TXhouston-tx48 inches
MNminneapolis-mn36 inches
ORportland-or60 inches
NCraleigh-nc12 inches
CAsan-diego-ca120 inches
NVlas-vegas-nv24 inches
CTct-state36 inches
DEde-wet-ponds-draft24 inches
DCdc-guidebook24 inches
IDidaho-bmp-catalog36 inches
INindiana-manual36 inches
MEmaine-manual12 inches
MDmd-state48 inches
MAma-state-draft24 inches
MOkansas-city-marc-bmp36 inches
MNmn-state-200836 inches
MSms-state-vol224 inches
MTbillings-mt36 inches
MTmt-deq812 inches
NJnj-state12 inches
NYny-state24 inches
OHohio-rainwater48 inches
PApa-state24 inches
PAphiladelphia-pa24 inches
RIri-state36 inches
HIhawaii-dot-pcbmp36 inches
TNtn-state24 inches
TXtx-edwards-rg34848 inches
VTvt-state36 inches
WAwa-state-western60 inches
WVwest-virginia-manual24 inches

Design infiltration rate

n=17 · mode=0.5 · median=0.5 · range=0.01–2.41 in/hr

StateSlugValue
NMalbuquerque-nm-gsi0.1 in/hr
TXhouston-tx0.5 in/hr
ORportland-or2 in/hr
CTct-state0.5 in/hr
TXdallas-tx0.5 in/hr
DCdc-guidebook0.5 in/hr
IDidaho-bmp-catalog0.4 in/hr
MEmaine-manual2.41 in/hr
MAma-state-draft0.01 in/hr
MOkansas-city-marc-bmp0.0208 in/hr
MSms-state-vol20.52 in/hr
NEne-ndot-stf0.5 in/hr
NYny-state0.5 in/hr
RIri-state0.5 in/hr
SCsouth-carolina-manual0.3 in/hr
VTvt-state0.2 in/hr
VAva-state0.5 in/hr
WVwest-virginia-manual0.5 in/hr

Regional modifiers

Cold climate and slower drainage

Drawdown expectations split between shorter windows (e.g., 24–48 hours in ID boise-id, ME maine-manual, MN mn-state-2008, VT vt-state, WA seattle-wa, WA wa-state-western) and longer allowances (72 hours in MA ma-state-draft, MT billings-mt, MT mt-deq8, NE ne-ndot-stf, NJ nj-state; 96 hours in NM albuquerque-nm-gsi, CA ca-caltrans-construction, CA los-angeles-ca; 120 hours in MS ms-state-vol2). SHWT separation spans 12 inches (ME maine-manual, MT mt-deq8) to 60 inches (WA bellevue-wa, OR portland-or, WA wa-state-western), with many northern and interior manuals at 24–36 inches (CT ct-state, IN indiana-manual, MN minneapolis-mn, MN mn-state-2008, MO kansas-city-marc-bmp). Design infiltration rates as low as 0.01–0.0208 in/hr (MA ma-state-draft, MO kansas-city-marc-bmp) and 0.2 in/hr (VT vt-state) contrast with 2–2.41 in/hr (OR portland-or, ME maine-manual), signaling that cold or conservative soil assumptions materially change trench sizing relative to the 0.5 in/hr modal temperate screening value.

States: ID, ME, MN, VT, WA, MA, MT, NE, NJ, NM, CA, MS, CT, IN, MO, OR. Sources: boise-id, maine-manual, mn-state-2008, vt-state, seattle-wa, wa-state-western, ma-state-draft, billings-mt, mt-deq8, ne-ndot-stf, nj-state, albuquerque-nm-gsi, ca-caltrans-construction, los-angeles-ca, ms-state-vol2, ct-state, indiana-manual, minneapolis-mn, kansas-city-marc-bmp, portland-or

Coastal and high water table

Several Atlantic and Gulf jurisdictions pair relatively tight SHWT separation with moderate drawdown: VA chesapeake-va lists 12 inches separation with 48-hour drawdown; NC raleigh-nc lists 12 inches separation; NJ nj-state lists 12 inches (chapter proxy); ME maine-manual lists 12 inches separation with 48-hour drawdown. TX houston-tx uses 48 inches SHWT separation with 48-hour drawdown and 0.5 in/hr design infiltration; MD md-state uses 48 inches separation with 24-hour drawdown. WQv depth in coastal cities often clusters at 1 inch (MD baltimore-md, VA chesapeake-va, VA norfolk-va) with TX houston-tx at 0.5 inches. These combinations imply trench feasibility is often governed by vertical clearance to saturated conditions rather than by a distinct trench depth standard in the matrix.

States: VA, NC, NJ, ME, TX, MD. Sources: chesapeake-va, raleigh-nc, nj-state, maine-manual, houston-tx, md-state, baltimore-md, norfolk-va

Arid and low precipitations

Arid manuals still cite site-wide volume and timing numbers but with notable low-end WQv depth and mixed drawdown: NV las-vegas-nv reports 0.37 inches WQv depth and 72-hour max drawdown with 24 inches SHWT separation; AZ flagstaff-az reports 1 inch WQv depth, 24-hour max drawdown; CO denver-co reports 0.6 inches WQv depth. NM albuquerque-nm-gsi sets 96-hour max drawdown, 36 inches SHWT separation, and 0.1 in/hr design infiltration—well below the 0.5 in/hr mode—so trench sizing in arid contexts may rely on conservative infiltration and longer drain times rather than the temperate modal pair of 48–72 hours and 0.5 in/hr.

States: NV, AZ, CO, NM. Sources: las-vegas-nv, flagstaff-az, denver-co, albuquerque-nm-gsi

Karst and fractured aquifer caution

The matrix does not isolate karst-specific trench depth or drawdown standards; the only clearly karst-referenced slug with SHWT separation is TX tx-edwards-rg348 at 48 inches, alongside TX houston-tx and TX dallas-tx WQv depths of 0.5 and 1.5 inches respectively and 0.5 in/hr design infiltration at houston-tx and dallas-tx. Numeric baseline for infiltration trench design in karst is therefore not established in this Tier A extract beyond general SHWT separation values shared with non-karst manuals.

States: TX. Sources: tx-edwards-rg348, houston-tx, dallas-tx

Open issues

Practice-specific trench geometry (length, width, rock reservoir depth, underdrain details) is largely absent from the numeric matrix; only jurisdiction site-wide WQv depth, drawdown, SHWT separation, and sporadic design infililation rates were extracted. Design infiltration rate has n=17 with high spread (0.01–2.41 in/hr), so the 0.5 in/hr mode is a weak national anchor. Max drawdown ranges from 4 hours (FL fl-fsesci-tier1) to 120 hours (MS ms-state-vol2), indicating inconsistent definitions or storm/climate framing across manuals. SHWT separation mode is 24 inches but median 36 inches, with an upper tail to 120 inches (CA san-diego-ca), so siting rules dominate but are not harmonized. Nearly half of scanned Tier A manuals lack extracted values for the three site-wide fields, and a majority of manuals mentioning the practice lack design infiltration rate—limiting committee confidence in a single numeric synthesis for infiltration trench alone versus general infiltration BMP context.