Stormwater Atlas

City of Memphis and Shelby County

Storm Water Management Manual Volume 1: Policies and Procedures

CityTennesseemediumNeeds reviewCitations verified

This extraction is flagged for quality review.

Compare each cited field to the official PDF before relying on it. What this means

Volume 1 is policy-only. Volumes 2–3 contain methods and BMP design criteria; extract those next for fuller WQ/peak methods. Pipeline excerpt repair removed 2 unlocated citation(s).

Fields not found in document: document_metadata.adoption_or_effective_date, document_metadata.last_revised_date, design_criteria.required_hydrologic_hydraulic_software, document_metadata.state_code, document_metadata.version_or_edition

Document Metadata

Jurisdiction level
City

City of Memphis and Shelby County

Title

State
Not found in document

No evidence cited

Version / edition
Not found in document

No evidence cited

Adoption / effective date
Not found in document

No evidence cited

Last revised date
Not found in document

No evidence cited

Relationship to state manual
independent

Storm Water Management Manual Volume 1

Title

Design Criteria

Design storm return periods (years)
10-year, 100-year

water with expected flows for the 10-year 24-hour storm event. The active path should be kept in pipes, ditches and streets. 2. Flood, flooded or flooding: A temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land from the overflow of a watercourse. 3. Fl

p. 40

Water quality volume method
Water quality BMPs are encouraged but not required under Volume 1 policy; stormwater management (detention) is mandatory. Detailed hydrologic methods and BMP design are in Volumes 2–3.

water quality BMPs are encouraged but not required

Policy

Peak flow calculation method(s)
Detention required for new development and significant redevelopment, 10-year storm defines active drainage path capacity context, 100-year floodplain / flood management definitions apply

this manual. 2.4 Storm Water Quantity Detention Increased urbanization within Memphis and Shelby County has caused radical changes to the topography, ground cover, and minor storm water management systems within each drainage basin. These changes have adverse effects on the env

p. 28

Hydrologic/hydraulic software
Not found in document

No evidence cited

Approved BMP categories
Detention, Water quality BMPs (encouraged), Erosion and sediment control measures

detention / water quality BMPs

Policy