Federal Highway Administration
HEC-22 Urban Drainage Design Manual
This extraction is flagged for quality review.
Compare each cited field to the official PDF before relying on it. What this means
Excerpts are overview/reference material; design storm return periods include multiple contexts (minor/major systems vs. detention regulatory examples). Document full title, adoption dates, and relationship to state manuals not stated in provided chunks. HEC-22 does not mandate a single required software list—programs are cited as commonly used, not exclusively required.
Document Metadata
“Federal, State, and local regulations often guide the quality and quantity of the discharge.”
Section 3.1, page 47
No evidence cited
“HEC-22, 4th edition Chapter 3 - System Planning”
page 47
No evidence cited
No evidence cited
No evidence cited
Design Criteria
“The minor system is typically designed to carry runoff from an intermediate design storm event such as the 0.1 annual exceedance probability (AEP) (10-year return period) event.”
Section 3.2, page 47
“engineers estimate first flush volume as: • The first 0.5 inch of runoff of impervious area. • The first 0.5 inch of runoff of the entire catchment area. • The first 1.0 inch of rainfall resulting in runoff from the entire catchment area.”
Section 11.1, page 231
“One of the most used approaches for the calculation of peak flow from small areas is the Rational Method”
Section 4.2.2, page 55
“Application of hydrograph methods often necessitates computer programs such as the Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS), the Stormwater Management Model (SWMM), WinTR-20, WinTR-55, among others”
Section 4.3 Design Hydrographs, page 64
“storm drainage systems often rely on detention or retention basins and other best management practices (BMPs) for the control of discharge quantity and quality.”
Section 3.1, page 47